Videos

2 experts are featured in this series.

Panelists discuss how guselkumab demonstrated a very reassuring safety profile with no new safety signals or unexpected adverse events compared with placebo and consistent with safety data from other disease indications, requiring no different monitoring protocols than standard care for Crohn’s disease patients on advanced therapies, while emphasizing that uncontrolled disease itself represents the biggest safety concern.

2 experts are featured in this series.

Panelists discuss how the GALAXI trial results demonstrated guselkumab’s durability, efficacy, rapid onset and clean safety profile with superiority over ustekinumab across most objective end points, including endoscopic response and deep remission. The clinical and endoscopic end points align with STRIDE-2 treatment targets and translate to meaningful patient outcomes, including symptom resolution and reduced future hospitalizations, surgeries and disease flares.

1 expert is featured in this series.

An expert discusses how nonstatin therapies serve as essential tools when patients can’t tolerate statins or need additional LDL cholesterol-lowering agents. These include ezetimibe (a cholesterol absorption inhibitor), bempedoic acid (a liver-specific prodrug) and PCSK9-interfering therapies (both injectable monoclonal antibodies and inclisiran), with treatment selection based on patient comorbidities, cardiovascular risk level and specific LDL cholesterol targets.

An expert discusses how insurance coverage barriers for Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors in vitiligo treatment can be overcome by demonstrating medical necessity, especially for visible areas such as the face and hands, while emphasizing the cultural and social stigma that makes treatment essential rather than cosmetic.

2 experts are featured in this series.

Panelists discuss how the GALAXI trials enrolled a broadly generalizable population of adults with moderate to severe Crohn’s disease (CDAI 220-450) requiring objective evidence of active inflammation, including both bio-naive and bio-experienced patients with approximately 40% to 50% having previously failed advanced therapies, although patients previously exposed to ustekinumab or other p19 inhibitors were excluded due to the active comparator design.

2 experts are featured in this series.

Panelists discuss how the GALAXI-2 and GALAXI-3 trials represented a landmark study design for Crohn’s disease research through their rigorous triple-dummy active comparator methodology, treat-through model without rerandomization, inclusion of both bio-naive and bio-experienced patients, composite primary end points measured at individual patient levels, and the unique ability to conduct pooled analyses comparing guselkumab directly with ustekinumab as an active comparator.

HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s vaccine policies, the federal government shutdown, most-favored-nation drug pricing and the future of Medicare Advantage were among the topics discussed by a panel of Washington, D.C., healthcare policy professionals during a Managed Healthcare Executive webinar. Ryann Hill, M.P.H., of Indigo Hill Strategies; Patrick Cooney of The Federal Group; and Lindsay Greenleaf, J.D., MBA, of ADVI Health, provided insights and observations about the Trump administration’s approach to healthcare and drug pricing policy. Peter Wehrwein, managing editor of Managed Healthcare Executive, moderated the discussion.

2 experts are featured in this series.

Panelists discuss how the expanding treatment landscape for Crohn’s disease includes multiple mechanisms of action such as anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents, anti-integrin agents, interleukin inhibitors, and Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, with particular focus on guselkumab’s unique dual-acting mechanism as an IL-23 p19 inhibitor that also reduces CD64 expression on intestinal macrophages, although the clinical significance of this dual action compared with other p19 inhibitors remains to be fully determined.

1 expert is featured in this series.

An expert discusses how primary and secondary prevention differ in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, with secondary prevention targeting patients who have already had events such as heart attacks or strokes and primary prevention addressing high-risk patients with multiple risk factors. He explains that statin intolerance can be complete (due to severe complications such as rhabdomyolysis) or partial (ranging from mild to severe muscle aches), while statin resistance occurs when patients tolerate the medication but don’t achieve expected LDL cholesterol reductions.