- Drug Coverage
- Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy (HCM)
- Vaccines: 2023 Year in Review
- Eyecare
- Urothelial Carcinoma
- Women's Health
- Hemophilia
- Heart Failure
- Vaccines
- Neonatal Care
- NSCLC
- Type II Inflammation
- Substance Use Disorder
- Gene Therapy
- Lung Cancer
- Spinal Muscular Atrophy
- HIV
- Post-Acute Care
- Liver Disease
- Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension
- Safety & Recalls
- Biologics
- Asthma
- Atrial Fibrillation
- Type I Diabetes
- RSV
- COVID-19
- Cardiovascular Diseases
- Breast Cancer
- Prescription Digital Therapeutics
- Reproductive Health
- The Improving Patient Access Podcast
- Blood Cancer
- Ulcerative Colitis
- Respiratory Conditions
- Multiple Sclerosis
- Digital Health
- Population Health
- Sleep Disorders
- Biosimilars
- Plaque Psoriasis
- Leukemia and Lymphoma
- Oncology
- Pediatrics
- Urology
- Obstetrics-Gynecology & Women's Health
- Opioids
- Solid Tumors
- Autoimmune Diseases
- Dermatology
- Diabetes
- Mental Health
Concerns in the Ease of Use for At-Home COVID Tests
As the need for rapid tests increase, the nation's largest non-profit patient safety organization evaluated seven COVID-19 rapid tests and found serious gaps in their usability. Results shared that none of the tests were rated as excellent and some had noteworthy usability concerns.
As the consumer demand for COVID-19 rapid tests increased due to the spread of the omicron variant, the nation's largest non-profit patient safety organization evaluated seven COVID-19 rapid tests and found serious gaps in their usability. According to experts at ECRI and their release, none of the tests were rated as excellent and some had noteworthy usability concerns.
ECRI analyzed seven popular COVID-19 rapid tests based on the well-established System Usability Scale (SUS), which rates products on a scale of 0 to 100 with 100 being the easiest to use. More than 30 points separated the top and bottom tests analyzed.
"Our evaluation shows that some rapid tests are much easier to use than others," says Marcus Schabacker, MD, PhD, president and CEO of ECRI, in the release. "If given options, consumers should choose tests that are the easiest to use because when a test is difficult for a consumer to use, it may lead to an inaccurate result."
The tests evaluated and their ratings on the SUS scale are:
1. On/Go - Very Good (82.9)
2. CareStart - Very Good (80.8)
3. Flowflex - Very Good (79.5)
4. QuickVue - Good (75.6)
5. BinaxNOW - Good (73.3)
6. InteliSwab - Good (73.3)
7. BD Veritor - Okay (51.8)
ECRI analysts said some tests require particularly fine motor control or have instructions with extremely small font size that may make it difficult for older adults and others with complex health conditions to use the tests correctly. Often, these groups are more susceptible to contracting COVID-19 and face more severe complications.
Given demand and supply issues, Schabacker said consumers may not be able to choose their rapid test and may have to rely on whatever is available to them. In that case, they should be aware of the specific usability concerns for that test so that they can try to mitigate any factors that may lead to an inaccurate result.
Latest Vaccines and Antiviral Treatments Show Promising Results in Reducing Severe COVID Outcomes
March 7th 2024It was found in a recent study that the updated Moderna, Pfizer-BioNTech and Novavax COVID-19 vaccines, when combined with antiviral treatments like nirmatrelvir and molnupiravir, can significantly decrease the chances of hospitalization and death from current COVID-19 variants.
Read More
In this episode, Peter Wehrwein, managing editor of Managed Healthcare Executive, speaks with Dr. Rodrigo Cerda. Dr. Cerda has been recently promoted to the position of senior vice president of health services and chief medical officer of Independence Blue Cross in Philadelphia. He is also a member of Managed Healthcare Executive’s editorial advisory board. Peter and Dr. Cerda discuss his new role at the Independence Blue Cross, what it means to be a chief medical officer at an insurer these days, valued-based care, social determinants of health, and, of course, the pandemic.
Listen
How More Prompt Action Could Have Saved Thousands of U.S. COVID-19 Deaths
December 10th 2023Researchers of a study compared Israel's CVOID-19 booster rollout experience to the United States to ask the question: How many lives could the U.S. have saved if boosters were authorized sooner?
Read More
Briana Contreras, associate editor of MHE, spoke with Dr. Maria Hernandez, founder and CEO of Impact4Health. Maria shared not only how healthcare inequities remain to be an issue and what needs to be addressed, but also the progress that has been made over time through awareness, conversations and laws, especially due to the heightened awareness of inequities caused from the COVID-19 pandemic and the tragic deaths of George Floyd, Breonna Taylor and many more - which have now occurred over a year ago.
Listen
A Cup or Two of Joe a Day Could Keep COVID-19 Infection Away
November 19th 2023Coffee, rich in polyphenolic compounds like chlorogenic acid (CGA), caffeic acid (CAA), cafestol, melanoidins and trigonelline, has been recognized as a dominant source of CGA in various studies. Previous studies suggest that CGA in coffee can positively impact blood pressure, lipid profile, glycemia and insulin resistance.
Read More
The Challenges, Strategies of COVID-19 Misinformation Interventions
November 16th 2023COVID-19 misinformation interventions should involve public health experts, establish consistent outcome measures and more to address health misinformation at individual, community and systems levels, according researchers of a recent study.
Read More
