The FDA’s controversial approval of Aduhelm (aducanumab) has put a spotlight on the accelerated approval pathway that the agency used to approve the drug.
The FDA’s controversial approval of Aduhelm (aducanumab) has put a spotlight on the accelerated approval pathway that the agency used to approve the drug. Devised in the early 1990s to make AIDS treatment drugs available more quickly, accelerated approval has become increasingly common, especially for drugs that treat cancer. The pathway has allowed drugs of questionable clinical value to get on the market, its critics say. Proponents, which include drugmakers, some patient groups and many physicians, say it has worked by and large as intended, speeding up access to needed therapies and spurring drug discovery in the process.
In an opinion piece published in JAMA Internal Medicine in July, three experts on drug approvals and costs outlined plans for reforming the accelerated approval process. One of the authors, Aaron Kesselheim, M.D., J.D., M.P.H., voted against approving Aduhelm as a member of an FDA advisory committee and resigned from the committee after the FDA approved the drug.
Kesselheim, a professor at Harvard Medical School; Bishal Gyawali, M.D., Ph.D., an associate professor at Queen’s University in Kingston, Ontario; and Joseph Ross, M.D., M.H.S., a professor at Yale School of Medicine, believe that the use of surrogate markers — usually a lab value or an imaging test result — instead of clinical end points is one of accelerated approval’s problem areas. They say the use of surrogate markers should be curtailed and that confirmatory trials should have clinical end points. Protocols for those confirmatory trials should be finalized as a condition for accelerated approval, they argue, and if a drug fails in a confirmatory trial, withdrawal of the approval that the FDA gave on an accelerated basis should be automatic.
Kesselheim, Gyawali and Ross also believe that the FDA, drugmakers and patient groups should start a public education campaign so patients know that the evidence for drugs approved on an accelerated basis is less certain and that the agency’s OK might be revoked if confirmatory trial results are negative.
Another one of their ideas: CMS and the Department of Veterans Affairs should use their power as payers to rein in spending on drugs that are on the market by virtue of accelerated approval’s lower thresholds. They could limit the prices they pay or exclude the drugs from mandated coverage.
Get the latest industry news, event updates, and more from Managed healthcare Executive.
Conversations with Perry and Friends: Saar Mahna, J.D., MBA
July 7th 2025Perry Cohen, Pharm.D., a longtime member of the Managed Healthcare Executive editorial advisory board, is host of the "Conversations with Perry and Friends" podcast. In this episode, Cohen speaks with Saar Mahna, J.D., MBA, CEO and founder of Banjo Health, an artificial intelligence company focused on prior authorization.
Listen
PBM-Offered Genomics Testing Could Reshape Prescribing of Medications
July 25th 2025Two PBMs, True Rx Health Strategies and Capital Rx, are using pharmacogenomics — how a person’s DNA affects their response to medications — to reduce the trial-and-error of prescribing medications, saving employers and patients time and money.
Read More
Conversations With Perry and Friends: Paul Fronstin, Ph.D.
May 9th 2025Perry Cohen, Pharm.D., a longtime member of the Managed Healthcare Executive editorial advisory board, is host of the Conversations with Perry and Friends podcast. In this episode, his guest is Paul Fronstin, Ph.D., director of health benefits research at the Employee Benefit Research Institute.
Listen
FDA Accepts Tabelecleucel BLA; Priority Review Granted for Post-Transplant Disease Therapy
July 24th 2025The FDA has accepted the resubmitted BLA for tabelecleucel (tab-cel), intended for the treatment of Epstein-Barr virus positive post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease (EBV+ PTLD).
Read More