Psychiatrists and psychologists also had lower in-network reimbursement rates.
Mental healthcare is increasingly inaccessible, and more and more patients are going out-of-network to get help, the results of a new study from the nonprofit research organization Research Triangle Institute, shows.
The study, called Behavioral Health Parity – Pervasive Disparities in Access to In-Network Care Continue, was led by economists Tami L. Mark, Ph.D., MBA and William Parish, Ph.D. They used data from 2019 to 2021 from MarketScan,one of the largest commercial insurance claims databases, to see how often patients were using out-of-network providers. Results were published online today.
Mark and Parish found that patients were 10.6 times more likely to go out-of- network for psychological visits than to find specialty care (18.2% as compared to 1.7%).
They also found that of the 24 listed specialist types, (allergists, cardiologists and neurologists etc.), patients went out-of-network the most for psychiatric office visits.
In addition, patients went out-of-network for psychiatric treatment 19.9 times more often than for medical inpatient treatment.
Results were consistent between telebehavioral and telemedicine visits too.
“The findings of this report, while not surprising, are gravely disappointing,” said APA CEO Arthur C. Evans Jr., PhD. in a press release. “The fact that so many patients are forced to go out-of-network to receive mental health and substance use care is unacceptable.”
These findings contradict the goals of the Mental Health Parity and Addictions Equity Act (MHPAEA) of 2008 which aimed to end discriminatory health plan coverage that prevents patients from receiving affordable care. To do this, it requires health plans to not have financial requirements when it comes to addiction and mental health services.
Provider shortages do not explain this disparity either, a reason that is commonly cited. Data from the U.S. Health Resources and Services Administration shows that there are 25% more shortages in primary care physicians when compared to mental health providers, Mark and Parish write.
To close this gap and improve access, Mark and Parish recommend that health plans and states expand their behavioral health networks and increase reimbursement rates, so they are comparable to medical/surgical provider rates. They also suggest evaluating reimbursement rates by provider type and consider not only the average reimbursement but reimbursement by the 50th, 75th and 95th percentiles.
For medical/surgical clinical office visits at the 95th percentile, reimbursement was 70.4% higher than for behavioral health clinicians.
In this latest episode of Tuning In to the C-Suite podcast, Briana Contreras, an editor with MHE had the pleasure of meeting Loren McCaghy, director of consulting, health and consumer engagement and product insight at Accenture, to discuss the organization's latest report on U.S. consumers switching healthcare providers and insurance payers.
Listen
In our latest "Meet the Board" podcast episode, Managed Healthcare Executive Editors caught up with editorial advisory board member, Eric Hunter, CEO of CareOregon, to discuss a number of topics, one including the merger that never closed with SCAN Health Plan due to local opposition from Oregonians.
Listen
Are PBMs Putting GLP-1 Drugs on Their Formularies?
October 11th 2024PBMs are putting weight loss drugs, including Wegovy and Zepbound, on their national formularies, but coverage by plans is uneven. What is needed is more data about whether these drugs can lower overall healthcare costs.
Read More