A policy requirement that employers with more than 200 full-time employees must enroll their employees in a company health plan may not take effect until 2015.
WASHINGTON - A policy requirement that employers with more than 200 full-time employees must enroll their employees in a company health plan may not take effect until 2015.
The Department of Labor (DOL) announced that its guidelines governing automatic enrollment will not be ready in time. Employers will not be required to comply with the provision, which was designed to increase the insurance pool, until after the rules are issued. And the clock is ticking.
The delay in the automatic-enrollment feature provides "welcome relief" to employers balancing other concerns and regulations of reform, according to New York City-based Buck Consultants. Health insurers would likely find the auto-enrollment an advantage as the market grows.
"An opt-in provision is actually pretty cheap," she says. "It's much easier to assume everyone's in. There are fewer administrative costs."
Employers now consider that employees who fail to opt in to coverage have waived the company benefit. However, once the new regulations take effect, the reverse will be true. The law allows employers to wait up to 90 days before enrolling new employees, who must be given adequate notice and an opportunity to opt out of the plan. What level of coverage employers must provide is expected to be part of the DOL guidance.
Full-time employees work an average of 30 hours or more per week. Employers who don't comply will face a penalty. Employers will have to look at their individual circumstances to determine whether the penalty is more or less than providing health insurance coverage itself, Udow-Phillips says.
"It's a wage issue," she says. "Employers have to do the calculations themselves, but it's complex and there are many different situations."
Upended: Can PBM Transparency Succeed?
March 6th 2024Simmering tensions in the pharmacy benefit management (PBM) industry have turned into fault lines. The PBMs challenging the "big three" have formed a trade association. Purchaser coalitions want change. The head of the industry's trade group says inherent marketplace friction has spilled over into political friction.
Read More
In this episode of the "Meet the Board" podcast series, Briana Contreras, Managed Healthcare Executive editor, speaks with Ateev Mehrotra, a member of the MHE editorial advisory board and a professor of healthcare policy and medicine at Harvard Medical School. Mehtrotra is also a hospitalist at the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston. In the discussion, Contreras gets to know Mehrotra more on a personal level and picks his brain on some of his research interests including telehealth, alternative payment models and price transparency.
Listen
Inflation Reduction Act: Reforms to Patient Cost-Sharing
September 18th 2023Lower out-of-pocket costs for patients might put upward pressure on drug prices, as manufacturers face less price sensitivity, note Matthew Majewski and Rhett Johnson of Charles River Associates. But they also note that upward pressure on price is likely to be limited to the inflation rate as any additional price increase would need to be paid back to CMS in the form of inflation rebates.
Read More
Spending climbed by 2.7% in 2021. In 2020, it soared by 10.3%, fueled by federal government spending in response to the pandemic. The blizzard of calculations of 2021 healthcare spending by CMS’ actuaries also provides further evidence that utilization of healthcare services bounced back in 2021.
Read More