Jonathan Roberts, M.D.: Treatment for hemophilia A over time has really evolved. A few decades ago, the focus was on obtaining a safe and pure recombinant factor product versus plasma-derived factor products where the half-life of these therapeutics is approximately eight to 12 hours in general, maybe even shorter in the pediatric population. And since then, in the past decade or more, we’ve seen an explosion in extended half-life therapies and nonfactor therapies for prophylactic management. With many more on the horizon, some newer products have been licensed and also gene therapy for individuals with hemophilia A. The challenge now as a clinician specializing in the field of coagulation, hemostasis, and taking care of these rare bleeding disorders is what type of therapy best fits your patient’s individual needs.

Factor 8 replacement has been the gold standard of hemophilia management and prophylactic therapy. Currently, on the market, there is one nonfactor factor 8 mimetic that’s a monoclonal bispecific antibody that’s also approved for prophylactic therapy. But still, the gold standard remains factor 8 therapy. And it depends on what your patient’s individual needs are as to what therapy is appropriate for them. The biggest difference with the current prophylactic therapies is, the bispecific antibody is subcutaneous. So especially now in patients who have difficult venous access or, young children that may otherwise require mediport placement. Now they’re able to have weekly subcutaneous prophylactic therapy. Now that being said, those patients that may be on that or any particular nonfactor therapy still would require factor 8 replacement if they had some sort of bleeding event or trauma breakthrough bleeding event. There are also, as I mentioned, other factor 8 therapies that have extended half-life capabilities that are all intravenously administered. So maybe for adults with hemophilia that don’t have intravenous access problems, the intravenous factor 8 therapies are very widely used for prophylaxis for hemophilia A.

I think the biggest challenges faced when treating hemophilia A are in determining what therapeutic regimen the patient will be most adherent to. So patient adherence is universally not unique just to hemophilia A but all fields in health care. But really trying to find out what particular barriers may exist in a patient’s life, whether they be problems with if they’re on intravenous therapy, being able to administer that at home, having technical skills to do that, or if it’s a child, the support system with parents or guardians that can actually safely administer their prophylactic therapy and then really trying to get to what the patient goals are. …[For] a more active patient, they’re going to need potentially more frequent therapy or more aggressive therapy, require more factor doses or finally regulating their nonfactor therapy. Maybe they’ll need additional factor in addition to their nonfactor prophylactic therapy that they’re on so that they can safely participate in the activities that they want to do. So really, it’s gone from this paradigm shift of, in the old days we were really just looking to maybe infuse with clotting factor concentrate a few days per week to try and prevent bleeds. Breakthrough bleeds would still happen. We tolerated it. And now really the paradigm shift is to focus on a life without bleeds for all individuals living with these disorders. So really being able to monitor factor levels and have a targeted pharmacokinetics of your individual patient - whatever therapy they’re on - is really useful in trying to then have your patient be adherent to therapy as possible.

Transcript edited for clarity.

Related Content

Hemgenix Gene Therapy Shows Long-Term Efficacy, Safety in Hemophilia B Patients

December 21st 2023

Article

Men with severe or moderately severe hemophilia B continue to display low bleeding rates and very little use of replacement therapies for at least three years following a single dose of the approved gene therapy hemgenix.

Bridging the Diversity Gap in Rare Disease Clinical Trials with Harsha Rajasimha of IndoUSrare

November 8th 2023

Podcast

Briana Contreras, an editor with Managed Healthcare Executive, spoke with Harsha Rajasimha, MD, founder and executive chairman of IndoUSrare, in this month's episode of Tuning in to the C-Suite podcast. The conversation was about how the disparity in diversity and ethnicity in rare disease clinical trials in the U.S. has led to gaps in understanding diseases and conditions, jeopardizing universal health, and increasing the economic burden of healthcare.

Listen

FDA Sets Review Date for Marstacimab to Treat Hemophilia

December 12th 2023

Article

Marstacimab is being reviewed to prevent or reduce the frequency of bleeding episodes in people with hemophilia A or B. The FDA has set an action date in the first quarter of 2024.

FDA Approves Adzynma for Rare Blood Clotting Disorder cTTP

November 27th 2023

Article

CTTP is rare hereditary blood clotting disorder stemming from a disease-causing mutation in the ADAMTS13 gene. This gene plays a crucial role in producing the ADAMTS13 enzyme, responsible for regulating blood clotting.

Study Highlights Poor Health Outcomes in Older Adults with Hemophilia

November 24th 2023

Article

People with moderate or severe hemophilia had worse joint status, lower pain thresholds, and poorer quality of life compared with people with mild hemophilia or healthy controls.

Diversity Gaps in U.S. Rare Disease Trials and the Inequalities in Hemophilia Clinical Studies

November 17th 2023

Article

Harsha Rajasimha, MD, founder and executive chairman of IndoUSrare, spoke to MHE about the current disparities in diversity and ethnicity in rare disease clinical trials in the U.S., as well as what he's seeing in clinical trials for diseases like hemophilia, in specific.