• Drug Coverage
  • Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy (HCM)
  • Vaccines: 2023 Year in Review
  • Eyecare
  • Urothelial Carcinoma
  • Women's Health
  • Hemophilia
  • Heart Failure
  • Vaccines
  • Neonatal Care
  • NSCLC
  • Type II Inflammation
  • Substance Use Disorder
  • Gene Therapy
  • Lung Cancer
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy
  • HIV
  • Post-Acute Care
  • Liver Disease
  • Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension
  • Safety & Recalls
  • Biologics
  • Asthma
  • Atrial Fibrillation
  • Type I Diabetes
  • RSV
  • COVID-19
  • Cardiovascular Diseases
  • Breast Cancer
  • Prescription Digital Therapeutics
  • Reproductive Health
  • The Improving Patient Access Podcast
  • Blood Cancer
  • Ulcerative Colitis
  • Respiratory Conditions
  • Multiple Sclerosis
  • Digital Health
  • Population Health
  • Sleep Disorders
  • Biosimilars
  • Plaque Psoriasis
  • Leukemia and Lymphoma
  • Oncology
  • Pediatrics
  • Urology
  • Obstetrics-Gynecology & Women's Health
  • Opioids
  • Solid Tumors
  • Autoimmune Diseases
  • Dermatology
  • Diabetes
  • Mental Health

Individualizing Treatment for Hemophilia A: A Key Approach in An Evolving Treatment Landscape

Opinion
Video

As more therapeutic options become available, individualizing treatment for hemophilia A becomes increasingly important.

Jonathan Roberts, MD: As the hemophilia landscape evolves, I think the individualization of hemophilia therapy becomes all the more important. I think, as I mentioned, the old paradigm of prophylaxis was infusing every other day or 3 times per week. It was a lot more cookie-cutter [approach], I would say. People would ascribe to that and didn’t really look at pharmacokinetic profiles that much because there wasn’t really an onus there. There wasn’t really a need to. And I think the community accepted the fact that breakthrough bleeding was inevitable. So you did your best to try to prevent as much as you could. And then as you’ve had an aging hemophilia population, we see that even a few joint bleeds, even 1 joint bleed has the potential to cause lifelong morbidity, and our mandate should be to prevent bleeds, period, in people who have bleeding disorders. So with all of the new options, as I mentioned, you know, factor VIII therapy and nonfactor therapies, gene therapies, the tools in the toolbox and the choices that patients and clinicians have to make is a lot more than it ever has been. So there’s a lot of education that needs to happen for both patients and clinicians to understand the nuances of each of these therapeutic options. They ultimately need to be comfortable with the knowns and unknowns about whatever option they choose and know how to manage bleeding when it occurs or trauma or surgery when it happens. So, I think, as I said, it’s an exciting time. There are lots of changes and developments, but I think it makes people like myself in the field and our mandate to advance the field through better clinical translational basic science research is certainly what I’m devoting the rest of my career to and I know many other colleagues are as well. But it really puts the onus on us to better understand how these therapies can enhance people’s lives with hemophilia.

Transcript edited for clarity.

Related Videos
Video 6 - "Navigating Insurance Coverage for Prescription Digital Therapeutics"
Video 5 - "FDA Approval Pathway for Prescription Digital Therapeutics"
Video 8 - "Gaps in Evidence Generation for Digital Therapeutics"
Video 7 - "Adoption Lessons For Payers"
Video 10 - "Managing Self Care"
Video 3 - "Embracing and Improving Access to Technology Tools"
Video 4 - "Assessing the Cost-Effectiveness of Prescription Digital Therapeutics "
Video 3 - "Harnessing Prescription Drug Therapeutics as Monotherapy and Adjunct Therapy"
Video 8 - "Demographic Differences That Impact Care"
Video 7 - "Gaps in Diabetes Education and Self Efficacy"
Related Content
© 2024 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.