HHS issued a final rule to guide states in establishing health insurance exchanges by the end of 2013.
WASHINGTON-After months of anticipation, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) issued a final rule to guide states in establishing health insurance exchanges by the end of 2013. Although the 646-page regulation provides many specifics on structuring and operating the marketplaces, state health officials and insurance executives still face uncertainty.
HHS leaders have been painting an optimistic picture on state progress, noting that 45 states have conducted background research on exchange operations, and 44 states have initiated IT gap analyses. Yet fewer than 20 states are in a position where they are likely to establish operational exchanges in time.
HHS has provided grants totaling $900 million to help states update information systems and develop exchange policies and procedures. To encourage more states to press on, HHS is handing out additional funds through the end of the year to those states moving forward more slowly.
HHS also plans to grant conditional certification to states that plan to establish an exchange but do not meet all the criteria for being operational by the end of this year. Yet, even with this extra flexibility, analysts predict that less than half the states will have exchanges ready for business by October 2013.
Many unknowns about how the exchanges will operate stem from the government's decision to let each state determine certain specifics. States must decide whether to structure an exchange as a non-profit or government agency and how to oversee the entity. Specifically, the final rule stipulates that at least one member of an exchange governing board has to represent consumers, while up to half of board members may come from industry and insurance companies.
A key issue for health insurers is whether a state permits all qualified health plans to be marketed through the exchange or if plans have to bid competitively. Related to this, states will establish marketing standards to ensure that approved plans don't cherry-pick healthier customers.
ESSENTIAL BENEFIT PACKAGE
States also will define the Essential Health Benefits package, and most are likely to choose the largest small-group plan as the local benchmark. Additional state-mandated benefits do not have to be finalized for another year. HHS has received thousands of comments on the guidance, primarily on benefit substitution, dollar limits and state mandates.
To handle the influx of newly subsidized enrollees, the final rule calls for states to establish Web-based systems and common application forms for individuals to apply for coverage. Last month, HHS clarified approaches for coordinating Medicaid eligibility and enrollment processes with exchange operations.
However, modernizing Medicaid enrollment processes will be a huge undertaking for most states. Even for those that actively support health reform, the timeframe "is brutal," according to Joshua Sharfstein, secretary of Maryland's department of health, speaking at the AHIP conference. He said that establishing Maryland's exchange involves replacing a 30-year-old legacy system.
In states that decide not to establish exchanges, consumers will be able to purchase coverage through a federal system. The Obama administration has requested an additional $800 million to operate the federal exchange, and Congress is balking at the amount.
Upended: Can PBM Transparency Succeed?
March 6th 2024Simmering tensions in the pharmacy benefit management (PBM) industry have turned into fault lines. The PBMs challenging the "big three" have formed a trade association. Purchaser coalitions want change. The head of the industry's trade group says inherent marketplace friction has spilled over into political friction.
Read More
In this episode of the "Meet the Board" podcast series, Briana Contreras, Managed Healthcare Executive editor, speaks with Ateev Mehrotra, a member of the MHE editorial advisory board and a professor of healthcare policy and medicine at Harvard Medical School. Mehtrotra is also a hospitalist at the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston. In the discussion, Contreras gets to know Mehrotra more on a personal level and picks his brain on some of his research interests including telehealth, alternative payment models and price transparency.
Listen
Inflation Reduction Act: Reforms to Patient Cost-Sharing
September 18th 2023Lower out-of-pocket costs for patients might put upward pressure on drug prices, as manufacturers face less price sensitivity, note Matthew Majewski and Rhett Johnson of Charles River Associates. But they also note that upward pressure on price is likely to be limited to the inflation rate as any additional price increase would need to be paid back to CMS in the form of inflation rebates.
Read More
Spending climbed by 2.7% in 2021. In 2020, it soared by 10.3%, fueled by federal government spending in response to the pandemic. The blizzard of calculations of 2021 healthcare spending by CMS’ actuaries also provides further evidence that utilization of healthcare services bounced back in 2021.
Read More