Medicare beneficiaries without subsidies were 35% to 50% less likely to fill their prescriptions for drugs used to treat cancers, immune system disorders, and high cholesterol.
Medicare patients who don’t receive subsidiaries often don’t fill their prescriptions for specialty medications, according to a new study in published in Health Affairs. Investigators found that beneficiaries receiving subsidies were nearly twice as likely to obtain the prescribed drug within 90 days as those without subsidies.
Among beneficiaries without subsidies, investigators found that 30% of prescriptions that were not filled were for anticancer drugs, 22% for hepatitis C treatments, and more than 50% for disease-modifying therapies for either immune system disorders or high cholesterol.
Stacie B. Dusetzina, Ph.D.
Investigators, led by Vanderbilt University Medical Center and Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center in Nashville, examined 17,076 new prescriptions issued between 2012 and 2018 for fee-for-service Part D beneficiaries from 11 health systems. In total, they found that almost half of the beneficiaries did not initiate the medication they were prescribed.
Those beneficiaries without subsidies are the most impacted by high costs, investigators found. For example, under the 2021 standard benefit, a prescription for the cancer drug Revlimid (lenalidomide) would cost more than $3,000 out-of-pocket, but less than $10 out of pocket for a person with a full low-income subsidy.
“The clinical implications of the levels of non-initiation that we observed are uncertain. Issuance of a prescription is evidence that a physician believes that a patient could benefit from a medication,” investigators wrote. “Given the high rates of non-initiation observed and the severity of illness that many of the drugs studied were prescribed to treat, it is likely that some patients were harmed by medication non-initiation.”
Investigators identified 17,076 prescriptions that met the criteria for high-price Part D specialty medications used to treat cancers (8,794 prescriptions and 6,990 people), hepatitis C (1,368 prescriptions and 1,210 people), immune system conditions (5,286 prescriptions and 4,275 people), or hypercholesterolemia (1,628 prescriptions and 1,364 people).
The proportion with full subsidies was highest among beneficiaries prescribed hepatitis C drugs (42.3%) and lowest among those prescribed specialty drugs for high cholesterol.
Investigators said that future studies should involve a greater number of sites and capture detailed clinical data available in health records and would follow patients for periods long enough to measure clinical outcomes.
Get the latest industry news, event updates, and more from Managed healthcare Executive.
PBM-Offered Genomics Testing Could Reshape Prescribing of Medications
July 25th 2025Two PBMs, True Rx Health Strategies and Capital Rx, are using pharmacogenomics — how a person’s DNA affects their response to medications — to reduce the trial-and-error of prescribing medications, saving employers and patients time and money.
Read More
FDA Extends Review of Blenrep Combinations in Multiple Myeloma
July 24th 2025Last week, an FDA advisory committee against the risk-benefit profile of Blenrep in combination with other therapies. Regulators and reviewers were concerned about the ocular side effects and dosing and tolerability. The new action date is Oct. 23, 2025.
Read More
Sarepta to Pause Shipments of the Gene Therapy Elevidys
July 22nd 2025Sarepta officials said the temporary halt in shipments was done to maintain a productive working relationship with regulators while they address a safety labeling update about the risk of acute liver disease related to Elevidys.
Read More