Prices in American healthcare are difficult to nail down because they are obscured by secret negotiations between payers and providers and, in the case of drugs, pharmaceutical manufacturers. But that is beginning to change.
Prices in American healthcare are difficult to nail down because they are obscured by secret negotiations between payers and providers and, in the case of drugs, pharmaceutical manufacturers. But that is beginning to change. Despite court challenges and uneven compliance, hospitals were forced to start disclosing prices at the beginning of this year.
Now, because of rules issued by the Trump administration, it is the PBMs’ turn. The price transparency rule, different parts of which go into effect next year and in 2023, would require disclosure of cost-sharing estimates to plan members, which isn’t controversial, but also the net prices that PBMs pay to drugmakers after discounts and rebates, which is. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the Pharmaceutical Care Management Association (PCMA), the PBM industry’s trade group, filed lawsuits challenging the net price disclosures in August.
Consumer advocates and others say disclosure of net drug prices would shed long-overdue light on the true price of drugs and how much money different players in the drug supply chain, particularly PBMs, are making.
Ironically, the anti-ACA Trump administration leaned on some disclosure provisions in the healthcare reform law to justify the price transparency rules. PCMA argues in its 85-page brief that this legal maneuver went way beyond the intent of the ACA provisions and that the ACA also didn’t contemplate sharing “machine readable” files that net pricing disclosures would require.
The trade group also argues that that disclosure of pricing information will be bad for health plans and their members because it will undercut the ability of PBMs to negotiate price concessions. Disclosure of net prices will establish a “pricing floor,” argues the brief, and will allow for tacit collusion among manufacturers, who will not be willing to offer prices below those of their competitors.
Bridging the Diversity Gap in Rare Disease Clinical Trials with Harsha Rajasimha of IndoUSrare
November 8th 2023Briana Contreras, an editor with Managed Healthcare Executive, spoke with Harsha Rajasimha, MD, founder and executive chairman of IndoUSrare, in this month's episode of Tuning in to the C-Suite podcast. The conversation was about how the disparity in diversity and ethnicity in rare disease clinical trials in the U.S. has led to gaps in understanding diseases and conditions, jeopardizing universal health, and increasing the economic burden of healthcare.
Listen
Managing Editor of Managed Healthcare Executive, Peter Wehrwein, had a discussion with William Shrank, M.D., a venture partner with Andreessen Horowitz, a venture capital firm in Menlo Park, California, about how artificial intelligence's role is improving healthcare, where we are today with value-based care and the ongoing efforts of reducing waste in the healthcare space for this episode of the "What's on Your Mind" podcast series.
Listen
35th World AIDS Day Marks 20 Years of PEPFAR: Challenges and Strategies to Combat HIV/AIDS
November 29th 2023PEPFAR, having invested $100 billion and saved 25 million lives in the global fight against HIV/AIDS, faces Congressional hurdles in its reauthorization due to abortion debates. Despite widespread support and no evidence of abortion-related activities, the legislative process is at a standstill. Members of PEPFAR and authors of a recent editorial stress the significance of PEPFAR and advocate for integrating behavioral and social science into healthcare programs to achieve UNAIDS targets and address barriers in HIV/AIDS testing and treatment.
Read More