Low-income subsidies can eliminate much of the out-of-pocket costs that patients must pay.
Antipsychotic medications can be cost-prohibitive for Medicare beneficiaries not receiving full-time low-income subsidies, requiring policy initiatives to reduce financial barriers to access. This is according to a poster1 presented at the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists 2022 Midyear Clinical Meeting, held December 4 to 8 in Las Vegas, Nevada.
Antipsychotic medication adherence is critical and can reduce the risk of both relapse and psychiatric hospitalizations for patients with schizophrenia. Approximately half of these patients are covered through Medicare via full-time low-income subsidies and low or no fixed copayments. However, patients with partial or no low-income subsidies can face “substantial” costs through Medicare Part D cost-sharing.
To review the out-of-pocket costs for antipsychotic medications by low-income subsidy status, researchers utilized claims data from 2019. Beneficiaries with claims from continuous fee-for-service Medicare Parts A, B, and D were included. Median out-of-pocket costs for a 30-day medication supply were estimated across generic and brand oral antipsychotics and first- and second-generation long-acting injectables.
The total sample included 283,813 Medicare beneficiaries with schizophrenia who were using antipsychotic medications. Ninety percent of these patients had full-time low-income subsidies, 1% had partial subsidies, and 9% had no low-income subsidies. Those with no subsidies experienced the highest median out of pocket costs; median out of pocket costs for a 30-day generic or brand name oral antipsychotic were $11.30 and $165.10 and $24.06 and $393.26for first- and second-generation long-acting injectables, respectively. Comparatively, patients with full low-income subsidies paid $1.20, $3.68, $1.34, and $4.07 for each category of medication.
Although the vast majority of Medicare beneficiaries qualify for full low-income subsidies and therefore pay minimal out-of-pocket costs for antipsychotic medications, “the remaining 10% face substantial [out-of-pocket costs],” particularly for oral antipsychotic and second-generation long-acting injectables. “Although partial [low-income subsidy] beneficiaries face lower [out-of-pocket] costs…the financial burden remains a challenge as they lie below 150% of the federal policy level,” the researchers noted.
“Our analyses suggest that policy efforts alleviating financial barriers to antipsychotic utilization are needed for non-[low-income subsidy] and partial [low-income subsidy] beneficiaries,” the authors concluded.
Reference
Get the latest industry news, event updates, and more from Managed healthcare Executive.
PBM-Offered Genomics Testing Could Reshape Prescribing of Medications
July 25th 2025Two PBMs, True Rx Health Strategies and Capital Rx, are using pharmacogenomics — how a person’s DNA affects their response to medications — to reduce the trial-and-error of prescribing medications, saving employers and patients time and money.
Read More
FDA Extends Review of Blenrep Combinations in Multiple Myeloma
July 24th 2025Last week, an FDA advisory committee against the risk-benefit profile of Blenrep in combination with other therapies. Regulators and reviewers were concerned about the ocular side effects and dosing and tolerability. The new action date is Oct. 23, 2025.
Read More
Sarepta to Pause Shipments of the Gene Therapy Elevidys
July 22nd 2025Sarepta officials said the temporary halt in shipments was done to maintain a productive working relationship with regulators while they address a safety labeling update about the risk of acute liver disease related to Elevidys.
Read More