OR WAIT 15 SECS
What new changes to the Home Health Prospective Payment System could mean.
CMS proposed significant changes to the Home Health Prospective Payment System (Home Health PPS).
The rule includes steps to implement the Patient-Driven Groupings Model (PDGM), a new case-mix, value-based payment system for home health agencies that ties Medicare reimbursement to patient characteristics rather than the number of therapy visits.
Key takeaways include:
In January 1, 2016, the CMS Innovation Center implemented the Home Health Value-Based Purchasing (HHVBP) Model. This new model was designed to support greater quality and efficiency of care among Medicare-certified Home Health Agencies (HHA) across the nation.
The HHVBP Model leverages the successes of and lessons learned from other value-based purchasing programs and demonstrations to shift from volume-based payments to a model designed to promote the delivery of higher quality care to Medicare beneficiaries. The overall purpose of the HHVBP Model is to improve the quality and delivery of home healthcare services to Medicare beneficiaries with specific goals to:
The HHVBP Model will be implemented among all HHAs in nine states representing each geographic area in the nation. All Medicare-certified HHAs that provide services in Massachusetts, Maryland, North Carolina, Florida, Washington, Arizona, Iowa, Nebraska, and Tennessee will compete on value in the HHVBP model, where payment is tied to quality performance. HHAs in these nine states will have their payments adjusted in the following manner:
“This model is designed so there is no selection bias, participants are representative of home health agencies nationally, and there is sufficient participation to generate meaningful results among all Medicare-certified HHAs nationally,” says Dominic Galante, MD, MS, chief medical officer, Access Experience Team at Precision for Value.
Related article: The Biggest Barrier to Home Healthcare
In 2019, for example, home health providers in the participating states were exposed to a maximum adjustment of 5%. In 2020, that adjustment rises to 6%, with a 1% annual increase in 2021 and 2022, he says. “For calendar year (CY) 2020, CMS is proposing to publicly report Total Performance Scores (TPS) and TPS Percentile Ranking for each home health agency in the nine model states that qualified for a payment adjustment. The agency expects that data to then be made public after December 1, 2021.”
“CMS is moving forward with many of the provisions originally included in the PDGM while also proposing to implement a new home infusion benefit, eliminate home health pre-payments and make Value-Based Purchasing Model (VBPM) performance data public,” says Galante. “Overall, CMS’s proposed rule for 2020 includes updates that would increase Medicare payments to home health agencies by 1.3%-or about $250 million.”
Most notably is CMS’s ambitions to phase out pre-payments for home health services, Galante says. “Currently, home health providers can obtain 50% to 60% of the anticipated payment at the beginning of a patient’s care episode through a Request for Anticipated Payment (RAP),” he says.
According to CMS, government watchdogs have seen a marked increase in RAP fraud schemes perpetrated by existing home health agencies that receive significant upfront payments, never submit final claims, and then close for business. Specifically, CMS is proposing to phase out RAP payments for existing providers over the next year and eliminate them completely by 2021.
Home infusion therapy
According to Galante, also included in CMS’s latest proposed payment rule is a pitch for a permanent home infusion therapy benefit to be implemented in calendar year 2021, a step mandated by the 21st Century Cures Act.
“The new permanent home infusion therapy benefit allows patients to receive a higher level of care in their home environment,” Galante says. “The proposed rule would allow providers to use durable medical equipment pumps and provide services at home. Beneficiaries could receive anti-infectives, chemotherapy, immune deficiency treatments, or other critical infusion drug therapies without having to go to the hospital or a provider’s office.”
CMS is also proposing to add two quality measures to the Home Health Quality Reporting Program (HH QRP) related to the transfer of health. Both measures would seek to decrease potentially inaccurate medications (PIMs) at the time of transfer or discharge by double-checking the patient’s list of medications before the patient leaves the care site. These adjustments also promote coordinated care, interoperability, and the transfer of health information.
A newly designed HH QRP standardized patient assessment data elements (SPADEs) would also serve, along with the rest of the Outcome Assessment Information Set, to improve coordination of care with a particular focus on mental health and social determinants of health, according to Galante.
“CMS would adjust the Home Health Value-Based Purchasing (HHVBP) model to publicize the home health reporting process,” he says. “For the nine states that qualified for a payment adjustment for CY 2020, the agency would publish the TPS and TPS percentile ranking from performance year five (CY 2020) annual TPS and payment adjustment report. The goal is to increase competition between HHAs to improve quality and to empower beneficiaries to make more knowledgeable provider selections.”
The new rule also would allow therapist assistants to perform at the top of their licensure and give maintenance therapy to patients in their homes, which extends the flexibility of home healthcare under Medicare.
“There were a couple of unexpected positive elements that were included in this rule that the home healthcare industry has been sharing thoughts and comments with CMS on for some time, and VBPM and remote patient monitoring were considered to be the biggest,” Galante says. “VBPM would more fairly weight achievement over improvement in rewarding or penalizing home health agencies. CMS is proposing multiple tweaks to VBPM for calendar year 2019 (based on learnings since the 2016 program implementation). The key takeaway, though, it that policy makers are fine tuning the model, perhaps gearing up for a larger or even U.S. expansion.”