New funding mechanisms offer opportunity to improve access to diabetes education

December 5, 2016

Telephonic and personalized diabetes self-education programs which fit into patient’s busy lives will make a greater impact than in-person classes only.

Diabetes is one of the most costly chronic conditions. Teaching patients to manage their own condition is a cost-effective approach resulting in reduced complications and improved health outcomes.

However, the current reimbursement model leads to gaps in access to diabetes self-management education and existing program designs are not convenient for patients. Recent innovative policy changes and funding models offer the opportunity to test new diabetes education delivery methods. There is no one-size-fits-all approach to diabetes education, and in order to extend programs to a wider audience, a combination of in-person and digital/telephonic programs should be used. Utilizing telehealth and designing programs that fit into patients’ lives will dramatically expand participation. 

Availability of diabetes education classes is limited

Education and disease management programs are commonly used by insurers to encourage behavior change. Programs that offer in-person group classes have been found to have a mixed impact. Medicare Part B reimburses accredited in-person diabetes self-management education (DSME). There are fewer DSME programs in rural areas due to a shortage of accredited providers, as a result of an expensive and laborious accreditation process. Even in areas where there are diabetes self-management programs, patients may not find the class times convenient for their schedule; ten hours of classroom education is hard to juggle between work and family commitments. In order to make lasting behavior change, programs have to meet people where they are and fit into their lives. We can bridge this gap and help providers touch patients outside of the office through telephonic diabetes education programs with one-on-one coaching focused on improving lifestyle, behavior and medication adherence. Utilizing telehealth allows patients to schedule education at a time that works for them.

Current reimbursement model limits accessibility

While Medicare Part B reimburses diabetes education and self-management programs, coverage varies among Medicaid and commercially insured populations. A recent study found that only 30 state Medicaid programs cover DSME programs and only 6.8% of privately insured diabetes patients took part in a DSME class. The most commonly reported barriers that prevent patients from engaging in DSME are 1) coverage and cost, 2) access and logistical issues such as scheduling and 3) patient believing they do not need the education. This same study found that insurers who reduce or eliminate patient cost-sharing for diabetes education programs will realize significant cost savings and higher participation. Another concern with the DSME program is that it is reimbursed under a fee-for-service model, where a provider is reimbursed a fixed amount for providing the training whether a person only goes to one class or graduates, completing all sessions. With this reimbursement model, there is little incentive to provide the thorough education necessary for successful self-management.

Next: Innovative funding

 

 

Innovative funding provides opportunity to expand access to diabetes education

To accelerate the shared government and provider objectives of reducing diabetes related complications and cost, innovative funding that expands access to diabetes education is necessary. The methods for achieving the objectives may be non-traditional. For example, Delivery System Reform Incentive Payment (DSRIP) programs provide funding to states in order to advance Medicaid payment reform and improve access to care, while reducing the cost throughout the healthcare system. Initiatives, such as DSRIP, give providers the opportunity to test new approaches with Medicaid populations in order to achieve outcomes and prevent complications at reduced costs. There is an opportunity to use DSRIP funding to supplement in-person DSME programs with virtual and telephonic education, which would improve access in urban areas, where in-person DSME classes might be inconveniently scheduled, and in rural areas that lack programs altogether. There is also an innovative national funding mechanism through the Medicare Advantage Value-Based Insurance Design (VBID) Program. Through this model, eligible plans can offer varied benefits for enrollees with diabetes to reduce cost-sharing and offer additional services.

This is a prime opportunity to offer innovative diabetes self-management education programs that bridge the access and coverage gaps. If we rethink who pays for DSME, how it is delivered, and how people are given options to engage in DSME, it will be more likely that people with diabetes will receive the education that they need to improve their health.

 

David Weingard is CEO of Fit4D.