
Stabilize dual eligible pay
An ongoing challenge particular to plans serving duals is a gap between the plans’ reimbursement rates and the health status of the populations they serve.
To better integrate benefits, Congress created the
Although these demonstrations are in their early stages, some states are migrating their dual-eligible populations to this new model. In San Mateo County, California, about 7,000 beneficiaries have moved from Health Plan of San Mateo’s D-SNP to its Medicare-Medicaid Plan (MMP) that participates in the California duals demonstration, Cal MediConnect. The plan’s MMP implemented a pilot program that connects high risk members to medical care, intense case management and housing support services that help them live and thrive in the community. In one case, a 69-year-old woman was admitted to a skilled nursing facility for rehabilitation after shoulder surgery. She had lived for 26 years in a Section 8 apartment. After a year at the nursing facility, her barrier to discharge was securing a new Section 8 unit. Her case manager worked with a local housing non-profit to find a unit that would accept her Section 8 voucher. They found an apartment, helped her move in, and secured a waiver to help her obtain furniture and houseware free of charge.
That’s the kind of thing Safety Net Health Plans can do through the duals demonstrations. MMPs manage almost all Medicare and Medicaid benefits for dual eligibles, which incentivizes innovation and better care management. However, these plans know through experience that these gains are precarious. Policymakers can stabilize D-SNPs and duals demonstrations by addressing the way that plans serving dual eligibles are reimbursed.
An ongoing challenge particular to plans serving duals is a gap between the plans’ reimbursement rates and the health status of the populations they serve. The current Medicare Advantage risk-adjustment methodology does not adequately account for the higher costs of the sickest dual-eligible beneficiaries.
In its Rate Adjustment and Final Call Letter issued in April, the
However, CMS is implementing a “clinically-revised” risk-adjustment model that would effectively slash reimbursement rates up to four percent for D-SNPs and MMPs. The revised model will harm most plans that exclusively enroll high-cost, full-benefit dual eligibles, because these plans do not enroll healthy Medicare beneficiaries whose costs are overestimated by risk adjustment.
Many not-for-profit net plans already operate in negative margins. This change could drive plans out of the duals demonstration and D-SNPs, and introduce uncertainty and change for beneficiaries. These programs hold tremendous promise. Let’s make changes early on to ensure their success.
Newsletter
Get the latest industry news, event updates, and more from Managed healthcare Executive.






















































