ICER: Draft Review Suggests Lecanemab’s Cost-effectiveness Range of $8,500-$20,600


ICER analysts remain uncertain about using amyloid removal as a surrogate marker for clinical benefit in Alzheimer’s disease.

In a preliminary draft, the Institute for Clinical and Economic Review has indicated that the prices needed to meet traditional cost-effectiveness thresholds for Eisai’s and Biogen’s lecanemab range between $8,500 and $20,600 for a year’s course of treatment. But ICER analysts cautioned that this is an initial assessment that could change after public comments are received. ICER’s Chief Medical Officer David Rind, M.D. will present the initial findings on Jan. 5, 2023. ICER will accept public comments until Feb. 2, 2023.

David Rind, M.D.

David Rind, M.D.

Lecanemab is a monoclonal antibody that targets beta amyloid to treat mild cognitive impairment in patients with early Alzheimer’s disease. It is currently under review by the FDA with a target action date of Jan. 6, 2023. The regulatory submission for lecanemab is based on clinical, biomarker and safety data from the proof-of-concept phase 2b in 856 people with early Alzheimer’s disease with confirmed presence of amyloid pathology, biomarker and safety data from an open-label extension study, and blinded safety data from the confirmatory phase 3 study.

The phase 2b study explored the impact of treatment with lecanemab on reducing amyloid plaque and clinical decline. At 18 months of treatment, lecanemab reduced brain amyloid by a mean of 0.306 standardized uptake value ratio, a common quantitative method used to measure comparisons using positron emission tomography. More than 80% of patients became amyloid negative by visual read.

Results from the Clarity AD phase 3 clinical study for lecanemab in early Alzheimer’s were released in November 2022. The primary endpoint of this study was mean change Clinical Dementia Rating scale Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) from baseline to 18 months. The CDR-SB score that is used to stage the severity of Alzheimer’s dementia and mild cognitive impairment. In the lecanemab arm, CDR-SB score was 1.21 compared with 1.66 in the placebo, which Eisai indicated represents a 27% slowing of cognitive decline.

In its analysis, ICER analysts said the 27% relative change in CDR-SB is similar to the change seen in EMERGE, the trial of the companies' Aduhelm (aducanumab), which received accelerated approval in June 2021. Aduhelm’s trials used the clearance of beta amyloid as a surrogate measure of clinical benefit. (Aduhelm initially launched at a price of $56,000, but has since dropped by half.)

ICER analysts, however, question whether the absolute change in CDR-SB is clinically relevant. “We do not feel that evidence is adequate at this point to assume that clearance of amyloid will necessarily improve cognitive outcomes,” they wrote in the preliminary report. “Patient-level evidence across trials and agents showing that degree of amyloid removal correlates with clinical benefit would be an important step in establishing amyloid removal as an important surrogate outcome.”

Because of the questions around amyloid removal as a surrogate marker in Alzheimer’s disease, ICER said it’s important to look at clinical outcomes and weigh those against risk, particularly amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA), including edema/effusion, hemorrhage or superficial siderosis (a disabling disorder affecting the brain and spinal cord). These abnormalities, ICER suggests, may be greater than what is seen in clinical trials. Additionally, total adverse events and serious adverse events were slightly higher in the lecanemab group than in the placebo group.

In its cost-effectiveness analysis, ICER used a placeholder price of $26,100 for lecanemab and used a hypothetical cohort of patients with mild cognitive impairment related to Alzheimer’s disease. Model outcomes included quality-adjusted life years, equal-value life years, life years, years living outside of long-term care, and costs over a lifetime time horizon. ICER found that the uncertainty of treatment effectiveness resulted in a wide range of potential cost-effectiveness estimates.

This story first appeared on Formulary Watch.

Related Content
© 2024 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.