Kaiser Family Foundation researcher found that 26% of those with an insulin prescription who have bought health insurance coverage in the individual market would benefit from a cap of $35 on monthly out-of-pocket costs for insulin.
Democrats and Republicans don’t agree on much. Caps on out-of-pocket costs for insulin might be an exception to the rule. Bipartisan talks are underway that would put a $35-per-month cap on out-of-pocket insulin costs. Some of the bills under consideration would also require insurers to cover at least one dosage form (pen, vial) of each type of insulin — rapid-acting, short-acting, intermediate-acting and so on.
Researchers at Kaiser Family Foundation set out to calculate how many people with private health insurance would benefit from such a cap. In other words, how many people pay more than $35 a month for insulin.
Using a 2018 claims database from private health plans, they identified roughly 1 million people who had a prescription for insulin filled. Of those, 184,000 were covered by plan sold in the individual market, 105,000 by a plan sold in the small employer market, and 802,000 by a plan in the large employer market.
They found that 26% of those with individual market coverage paid more than $35 per month on average for their insulin prescription. In the small employer market, the percentage was 31%, and in the large market it was 19%.
Of course, the savings would be greater for some than others depending on their plan’s coverage. The Kaiser Family Foundation researchers found that for more than 1 in 20 insulin users with private insurance pay more than $150 per month for their insulin, so for that group would save at least $115 a month if a $35 cap were imposed.
But, as the foundation researchers note, a ceiling on out-of-pocket costs does not deal directly with the prices that insulin makers are charging. If out-of-pocket costs are limited that may shift added cost to health plans, which, in turn, may put upward pressure on premiums.
There is a chance, though, that lower out-of-pocket costs will indirectly benefit payers if people are more adherent and need fewer medical services as a result.
In this latest episode of Tuning In to the C-Suite podcast, Briana Contreras, an editor with MHE had the pleasure of meeting Loren McCaghy, director of consulting, health and consumer engagement and product insight at Accenture, to discuss the organization's latest report on U.S. consumers switching healthcare providers and insurance payers.
Listen
Early Genetic Testing Avoids Treatment Delays for Patients with Friedreich Ataxia
September 18th 2024Genetic and biochemical testing are crucial for improving outcomes for patients with Friedreich ataxia, according to speakers at a symposium at the European Association of Neurology Congress.
Read More
In our latest "Meet the Board" podcast episode, Managed Healthcare Executive Editors caught up with editorial advisory board member, Eric Hunter, CEO of CareOregon, to discuss a number of topics, one including the merger that never closed with SCAN Health Plan due to local opposition from Oregonians.
Listen