Results of study published in JAMA Oncology suggest that it is the period after chemotherapy when cancer patients are most vulnerable to experiencing a serious case of COVID-19.
For people with cancer and the clinicians who take care of them, the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic were frightening. Concern that cancer patients might be especially vulnerable to the severe cases of the new disease ran high, partly because cancer patients often have compromised immune systems.
But research since has painted a nuanced picture. Some of the early concerns that all cancer patients would be at higher risk of suffering a serious case of COVID-19 have been allayed. But it’s hardly a carefree situation, either. Several large studies have found that recently treated cancer patients — what recent means varies with the study — are more likely to experience a severe case of COVID-19 and death from the disease than people without cancer.
Results of a large study reported last week JAMA Oncology add to that evidence and elaborate upon it. Mariana Chavez-MacGregor, M.D., M.Sc., a researcher at the MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, and her colleagues found that cancer patients with no recent treatment (treatment within three months of their COVID-19 diagnosis) had similar and sometimes better outcomes when they contracted COVID-19 than patients without cancer histories who contracted COVID-19. They also found that the type of cancer treatment made a difference in the severity of the COVID-19 outcomes. Chemotherapy and chemoimmunotherapy were associated with adverse COVID-19 outcomes (mortality, hospitalization, ICU care) but immunotherapy, targeted therapy and endocrine therapy were not (with the exception of mechanical ventilation. Chavez-MacGregor and her colleagues offered two possible explanations: the immunosuppressive effects of chemotherapy make patients more vulnerable to experiencing a severe case of COVID-19 or the patients treated with other types of treatment (they only specifically mention endocrine treatment) are a healthier population that can fight off the COVID-19’s worst effects.
The study is impressive partly because it includes so many patients. With access to Optum de-identified database of electronic health records, the researchers compared more than 490,000 COVID-19 patients without cancer to nearly 10,000 with a cancer diagnosis to about 4,200 who had been recently treated.
In a rough first cut of the data, patients with cancer, regardless of when they received treatment, were more likely to experience a serious case of COVID-19 — and death from the disease — than patients without cancer. But after statistical adjustments for other risk factors, that difference disappeared except for patients who had been recently treated.
Chavez-MacGregor and her colleagues also parsed the data by tumor type: Patients with metastatic solid tumors and hematologic cancers fared worse than with solid tumors.
The MD Anderson researchers said their results are consistent with those reported from the National COVID Cohort Collaborative in June in the Journal of Clinical Oncology. That study, which included almost 400,000 adult cancer patients found a relationship between recent chemotherapy and increased risk of mortality from COVID-19 but no increased risk among those treated with immunotherapy and targeted therapy
Latest Vaccines and Antiviral Treatments Show Promising Results in Reducing Severe COVID Outcomes
March 7th 2024It was found in a recent study that the updated Moderna, Pfizer-BioNTech and Novavax COVID-19 vaccines, when combined with antiviral treatments like nirmatrelvir and molnupiravir, can significantly decrease the chances of hospitalization and death from current COVID-19 variants.
Read More
In this episode, Peter Wehrwein, managing editor of Managed Healthcare Executive, speaks with Dr. Rodrigo Cerda. Dr. Cerda has been recently promoted to the position of senior vice president of health services and chief medical officer of Independence Blue Cross in Philadelphia. He is also a member of Managed Healthcare Executive’s editorial advisory board. Peter and Dr. Cerda discuss his new role at the Independence Blue Cross, what it means to be a chief medical officer at an insurer these days, valued-based care, social determinants of health, and, of course, the pandemic.
Listen
How More Prompt Action Could Have Saved Thousands of U.S. COVID-19 Deaths
December 10th 2023Researchers of a study compared Israel's CVOID-19 booster rollout experience to the United States to ask the question: How many lives could the U.S. have saved if boosters were authorized sooner?
Read More
Briana Contreras, associate editor of MHE, spoke with Dr. Maria Hernandez, founder and CEO of Impact4Health. Maria shared not only how healthcare inequities remain to be an issue and what needs to be addressed, but also the progress that has been made over time through awareness, conversations and laws, especially due to the heightened awareness of inequities caused from the COVID-19 pandemic and the tragic deaths of George Floyd, Breonna Taylor and many more - which have now occurred over a year ago.
Listen
A Cup or Two of Joe a Day Could Keep COVID-19 Infection Away
November 19th 2023Coffee, rich in polyphenolic compounds like chlorogenic acid (CGA), caffeic acid (CAA), cafestol, melanoidins and trigonelline, has been recognized as a dominant source of CGA in various studies. Previous studies suggest that CGA in coffee can positively impact blood pressure, lipid profile, glycemia and insulin resistance.
Read More
The Challenges, Strategies of COVID-19 Misinformation Interventions
November 16th 2023COVID-19 misinformation interventions should involve public health experts, establish consistent outcome measures and more to address health misinformation at individual, community and systems levels, according researchers of a recent study.
Read More