News

A drug use evaluation at Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center (WFUBMC) was initiated following a change in institution-approved guidelines for the administration of amphotericin B lipid complex injection (ABLC) (Abelcet, Enzon). This study was conducted to determine compliance with the new guidelines among prescribers and to characterize the population of patients receiving ABLC. A total of 153 patients received ABLC from April 2001 through December 2002. One hundred thirty-three patients (87%) met 1 or more of the institutional criteria for ABLC administration and 20 (13%) receiving ABLC did not meet the guidelines. The mean baseline serum creatinine (SCr) value among patients meeting institutional guidelines (n=133) was 2.0 mg/dL (range, 0.5–5.0 mg/dL). Among patients who did not meet the guidelines (n=20), the mean baseline SCr level was 1.7 mg/dL (range, 0.6–2.9 mg/dL). The use of new guidelines, which were less stringent than previous guidelines, resulted in earlier administration..

A variety of clinical approaches are utilized in the management of poor glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes. Sitagliptin (Januvia, Merck), a novel drug in a new medication class known as dipeptidyl peptidase-IV (DPP-IV) inhibitors, offers a new mechanism by which to achieve glycemic control. Although stimulation of receptors by the glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) enhances the body's ability to produce insulin in response to elevated blood glucose concentrations, rapid degradation of GLP-1 by DPP-IV limits its clinical effectiveness. The development of medications to reduce this degradation is being pursued by numerous manufacturers. An NDA for the first of these medications, sitagliptin, was submitted to FDA in February 2006. Currently available clinical studies have demonstrated improved glycemic control with sitagliptin therapy in patients who have not achieved target glucose levels with diet and oral medications. (Formulary. 2006;41:434–441.)

Approvable designations; Priority review; Fast-track designations; Orphan drug designations; Nonapprovable designations

When the Academy for International Health Studies traveled to Prague in April for its annual trade/study mission, little did the delegates know they were about to enter a healthcare war zone. Weeks in advance of a contentious national election, the country's prime minister recently had fired the minister of health and named a successor with a mandate to implement some quick fixes. Insurers managed their strained cash flows by slowing payments to providers while the new minister, seemingly arbitrarily, mandated price reductions. The result was a physician-organized strike and thousands of angry, untreated patients.

As CMS has begun to promote its quality agenda through pay-for-performance (P4P) initiatives, private payers should consider certain regulatory issues in establishing such programs.

Winona Health, a locally owned and operated nonprofit organization in Winona, Minn., had an outdated and cumbersome technology infrastructure, which hampered its ability to serve its community. With more than 900 employees at Winona Health and its affiliates, Winona's financial and billing systems couldn't keep up with the firm's growth or increasingly complex reporting and tracking requirements. Of particular importance was automating Winona Health's human resources and payroll processes-employee hours were being logged manually, making the maintenance of labor law requirements for overtime, weekends and holidays time-intensive.

With radiology costs in the United States growing to more than $100 billion annually, diagnostic imaging is the second-largest and fastest-growing expense for health plans behind pharmaceuticals. Unmanaged, radiology spending is expected to continue growing at a rate of 20% annually. Factors driving this growth include fragmentation of care, the continual advances in diagnostic imaging technology, the affordability of imaging equipment leading to adoption and utilization in more care settings, direct advertising to patients, and an aging population. As a result, radiology utilization management has become a top priority for health plans.

One of the things I love about living in the suburbs is the close proximity of retail when I need to get my errands done. In a three-mile stretch, I can eat lunch, hit the ATM, buy a gift, fill up my gas tank and replenish my groceries. At the grocery store, I can buy stamps and drop off my dry cleaning, too.

As the healthcare industry strives to establish appropriate and effective standards for the public reporting of clinical data, providers may lose sight of how they can make a critical difference in ensuring new reporting standards do not distract from, but rather aid in, achieving the primary goal of improving patient care.

New incretin-based therapies will soon enter the therapeutic armamentarium for type 2 diabetes. Two dipeptidyl peptidase (DPP)-IV inhibitors in phase 3 clinical trials, vildagliptin and sitagliptin, are oral agents that can be used once daily as monotherapy or in combination with other oral antidiabetic agents to reduce levels of hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) with few side effects, little risk of hypoglycemia, and no promotion of weight gain, researchers reported at the 66th scientific sessions of the American Diabetes Association (ADA) in Washington, DC.

Anidulafungin (Eraxis, Pfizer) is a new echinocandin approved for the treatment of Candida infection in adults. Like other echinocandins, anidulafungin acts on the fungal cell wall by inhibiting 1,3 beta-D glucan synthesis. Studies suggest that among the echinocandins, anidulafungin may have more potent in vitro activity against Candida spp and Aspergillus spp. Further, phase 2 and 3 clinical studies with anidulafungin have supported a high end of therapy success rates for invasive candidiasis, including esophageal candidiasis. Anidulafungin appears to be well tolerated, with headache, nausea, vomiting, phlebitis, neutropenia, and hypokalemia being the most commonly reported adverse effects. Importantly, as anidulafungin is chemically degraded, it has no clinically significant drug interactions and does not require any dose adjustment for renal or hepatic impairment.

The role of cost- and pharmacoeconomic-related criteria in formulary decision-making was assessed in a literature review of 31 studies of hospital (n=18) and managed care (n=13) pharmacy and therapeutics (P&T) committees. In both settings, cost was important, although the elements of cost considered varied. Acquisition cost was mentioned more frequently than pharmacoeconomic or cost-effectiveness information. Other factors, including drug characteristics, quality of life, supply-related issues, and physician demand, also influenced decisions.

Hepatitis B immune globulin (human) (Nabi-HB, Nabi Bio-pharmaceuticals) for the treatment of hepatitis B infection

FDA actions in brief

FDA approved the etonogestrel 68-mg implant (Implanon, Organon), a single-rod implantable device that prevents pregnancy for up to 3 years.

Atripla

This fixed-dose combination tablet contains: efavirenz, a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI); emtricitabine, a synthetic nucleoside analog of cytidine; and tenofovir disoproxil, which is converted in vivo to tenofovir, an acyclic nucleoside phosphonate (nucleotide) analog of adenosine 5'-monophosphate.

Sprycel

Dasatinib is an inhibitor of multiple tyrosine kinases and is active in vitro against leukemic cell lines representing variants of imatinib-sensitive and -resistant disease.

Prezista

This inhibitor of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) protease selectively inhibits the cleavage of HIV-encoded Gag-Pol polyproteins in infected cells, thereby preventing the formation of mature virus particles.

Lucentis

This recombinant humanized IgG1 monoclonal antibody fragment binds to the receptor-binding site of active forms of human vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A).

An ongoing issue among insurers is how to determine "usual and customary" (U&C) charges for medically necessary services that are provided by out-of-network providers. While some state laws require an insurer to pay U&C charges, there often is limited guidance as to how to calculate those charges. Case law from various jurisdictions, as well as several treatises, suggest that U&C may be based on the prevailing rates for similar services in the community and that actual charges billed by the provider are not determinative.