• Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy (HCM)
  • Vaccines: 2023 Year in Review
  • Eyecare
  • Urothelial Carcinoma
  • Women's Health
  • Hemophilia
  • Heart Failure
  • Vaccines
  • Neonatal Care
  • Type II Inflammation
  • Substance Use Disorder
  • Gene Therapy
  • Lung Cancer
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy
  • HIV
  • Post-Acute Care
  • Liver Disease
  • Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension
  • Biologics
  • Asthma
  • Atrial Fibrillation
  • Type I Diabetes
  • RSV
  • COVID-19
  • Cardiovascular Diseases
  • Breast Cancer
  • Prescription Digital Therapeutics
  • Reproductive Health
  • The Improving Patient Access Podcast
  • Blood Cancer
  • Ulcerative Colitis
  • Respiratory Conditions
  • Multiple Sclerosis
  • Digital Health
  • Population Health
  • Sleep Disorders
  • Biosimilars
  • Plaque Psoriasis
  • Leukemia and Lymphoma
  • Oncology
  • Pediatrics
  • Urology
  • Obstetrics-Gynecology & Women's Health
  • Opioids
  • Solid Tumors
  • Autoimmune Diseases
  • Dermatology
  • Diabetes
  • Mental Health

Managing UF Treatment


Dr Lopes discusses the typical payer challenges with managing UF treatment, including pain management.

Maria Lopes, MD: Of the payer challenges around treatment for this population, 1 of the biggest is addressing fibroids. The treatment of fibroids is almost as individual as the patient themselves. Starting with patient age, are they done with childbearing? Is there a cervical or variant pathology? How do you choose the therapeutic approach? Is it a small or large fibroid, and how many fibroids are there? Where is the location? The payer challenges are that we have all these options. Some of them are surgical, and others are nonsurgical. Typically, the payer is looking at guidelines and the standard-of-care approach. Not everything will require a prior authorization.

Usually, for a procedure or for an expensive therapeutic option, like a GNRH or GNRH antagonist, there will be a prior authorization to ensure appropriate use. Part of the payer challenge is considering the unmet need, efficacy, safety with treatment, and guidelines. The challenge is: how you consider individual patient choice and shared decision-making beyond the approach of NSAIDs [nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs], acknowledging that we’re in an opioid epidemic.

Related to pain and bleeding, but particularly pain, 1 of the biggest challenges is if having enough therapeutic options to manage symptoms. Are there alternatives to opioids? Because that’s the last thing you want to place a patient on. It’s about choice, the ground between clinician and patient, and the best fit for that individual.

As a payer, we have enough choices that are evidence based and clinically effective, safe, and durable. It isn’t just a short-term problem; it’s a long-term issue. Some treatment options consider efficacy, safety, and the limitations that they may have over the long haul. For example, GNRH analogs typically are for a short period of time, unless you add estrogen, because there’s an impact on bone mineral density. These challenges present themselves clinically and on the payer side in terms of enough options. If you have limitations on how long you can be on an effective treatment, that calls for an unmet need for more therapeutic options.

This transcript has been edited for clarity.

Related Videos
Video 2 - "Bridging Care Gaps with Prescription Digital Therapeutics"
Video 1 - "Overview of Prescription Digital Therapeutics and Impact on Clinical Practice"
Video 4 - "Payer Challenges in Evaluating Digital Therapeutics"
Video 3 - "Industry Collaboration in Shaping Digital Therapeutics Standards"
Video 6 - "Key Takeaways and Unmet Needs in Diabetes Treatment"
Video 5 - "Allocation of Investment and Value-Based Arrangements in Diabetes Care "
Video 4 - "Diabetes Prevention and Reducing Disparities Across Populations"
Video 3 - "Integrating CGMs into Diabetes Treatment Programs"
© 2024 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.