Marc Helberg

home

authors

marc-helberg

Just a few months into the pandemic, many people had begun putting their healthcare needs on hold. CDC figures from June 2020 show that about 41% of adults had opted to 

. Now, 20-plus months later, care avoidance of common chronic and acute conditions has only worsened.

Instead of getting physicals or checkups, people are putting them off. Why? The root causes are numerous. Many simply have decided that going to a doctor’s office or medical center isn’t worth the chance of potential exposure to a contagious disease. Some no longer have healthcare coverage after losing a job. Others don’t want to spend money on copays, especially with rising inflation.

The result of all these postponements is only now beginning to come to light, and it’s downright scary. Take expected mortality rates, for example. Life expectancy rates 

 in 2020 alone. Though this was mostly due to pandemic-related deaths, healthcare avoidance could make matters worse. When people skip years of going to the doctor, they lose touch with their general health. They also put themselves at risk of late diagnosis of costly problems.

Cancer, for instance, is best identified and treated in its earliest stages. Waiting too long can put financial burdens on patients, their families, and the healthcare system. Plus, if everyone begins returning to the doctor after years of personal neglect, providers may experience additional burnout due to a sicker patient load. And the last thing healthcare workers need is more turnover.

What, then, are some answers to this issue? How can we ensure success and better experiences? Below are a few ways to untangle the knot and avoid a large portion of the population suffering needlessly down the road.

1. Healthcare entities can educate consumers.

Remember those widespread public education campaigns dedicated to prioritizing smoking cessation? Or ones designed to promote mental health awareness? Healthcare organizations and nonprofits with clout could engage in similar initiatives to get people back to their normal healthcare screening routines and fulfill the promise of their futures.

Such initiatives would require initial smaller financial investments today but could save untold dollars over the coming decades. Remember: Prevention is always cheaper than intervention. Stopping a heart attack from occurring is better for every part of the healthcare structure, from patient to insurance company.

2. Patients can learn innovative ways to make self-care a priority.

Patients may be hesitant to visit healthcare providers. Nonetheless, they can learn to perform self-examinations and even use wellness technology at home. There are plenty of technical innovations that enable consumers to track their vital signs. And if they notice issues, they can contact their primary care providers right away.

It’s not hard to envision a day when patients take more ownership of their health through technologies like apps. Society has adjusted fairly quickly to using applications such as Uber and DoorDash to meet their basic needs. Embracing the use of intuitively designed portable sensors and diagnostic devices doesn’t seem like such a stretch. There’s endless potential here.

3. Providers can remain open to telemedicine but encourage in-person visits.

The rise of telehealth has opened doors and closed gaps when it comes to healthcare. However, telemedicine isn’t the right fit for all patient needs. Patients and their doctors should work together to figure out when remote treatment makes sense versus when an office check-in may be more practical.

Tailoring the patient-provider relationship will take time. Yet it can help providers encourage reluctant patients to come back. The longer patients backburner their wellness visits, the higher the chance that they’ll become accustomed to this unhealthy practice. If doctors and other providers assertively step in now, they can stave off a host of problems in the years to come.

COVID’s prevalence in our lives requires flexible thinking. We can’t put off routine healthcare maintenance forever. Thankfully, it’s not impossible to solve problems without a clear solution. Action is key. Now is the time to identify, architect, and develop a solution to address the delay of routine healthcare maintenance among adults and families. Otherwise, it will become a “pay now or pay later” situation — and the eventual price will be far too unpalatable.

 is the managing vice president at the Philadelphia office of 

, a consulting firm driven to create innovative, growth-oriented, and people-first solutions.

Articles

CDC figures from June 2020 show that about 41% of adults had opted to delay visiting a medical provider. Now, 20-plus months later, care avoidance of common chronic and acute conditions has only worsened.

People Aren’t Going to Their PCPs. Here’s How to Get Them Back.

As the distribution of COVID-19 vaccines becomes 

, healthcare providers are preparing for a return to some sense of “normalcy,” including in-person patient visits. It’s easy to understand why: Most healthcare practices reported 

 due to the pandemic and attributed that to access to care.

While it’s tempting to advertise in-person procedures at the first available opportunity, many patients remain skeptical about safety. COVID-19 cases are 

 with new mutations of the virus, so how do healthcare providers inspire patient confidence while also providing the safest treatment experience possible?

Using technology to take a conscientious approach to patient care is a great place to start. Consider offering permanent telehealth treatment options and remember that comfort levels vary. The truth is, some patients may never feel comfortable returning to in-person care unless it is absolutely necessary.

In-Person Patient Care Solutions for the Future

As more patients return to doctors’ offices and other facilities, providers must ensure a low risk of COVID-19 transmission. Dental offices provide an example of low transmission rates in a somewhat “high-risk” setting. After all, dental patients must appear in-office for dental work.

 from the American Dental Association, less than 1% of dentists nationwide tested positive for COVID-19. These findings came shortly after dentistry was labeled as a high-risk occupation for COVID-19 exposure. Dentists largely attributed their “success” to 

, including face shields, masking, and more. In fact, dentists seemed to be ahead of the curve pre-pandemic: Most dentist office equipment has been wrapped in plastic and technicians have been wearing masks for quite some time now.

Although virtual care services were essential to decreasing transmission rates last year, doctors must perform some procedures on-site. To meet heightened safety concerns, healthcare providers should 

revisit their infection control procedures

 and reduce the number of patient touch points. Doctors can also use advanced analytics, including artificial intelligence and machine learning on various platforms, to separate the sickest patients from others and to detect changes in a patient’s condition during the visit.

Best Practices for Flexibility and Resilience in 2021

In order for healthcare providers (and patients) to recover in 2021, it’s important to prioritize both safety and profitability. This requires assessing which aspects of patient care can be handled virtually. During this process, providers can also measure which services are the most profitable and continue to maintain financial stability.

One looming question that healthcare providers face this year is 

reimbursement for telehealth appointments

. Some critics of virtual care claim this is the end of telehealth, while others stipulate that the future of telemedicine remains uncertain. The pandemic created a public health emergency, so federal and state agencies expanded access to telehealth visits. This might fall into limbo as the pandemic dissipates.

Healthcare providers also worry about profitability. While reducing expenditures seems like the obvious answer, this may actually deter patients from visiting. Instead, medical facilities should focus on the patient experience and pay closer attention to customer service, follow-up care, and technologies geared toward convenience. By making care more accessible and centered on the patient, healthcare providers can improve their financial standing and patients’ health.

Leaders facilitating an effective return to in-person treatments can use technology to further this process safely. Here are a few strategies to consider when developing a plan to transition to in-person treatment:

1. Distinguish which treatments require in-person care.

Not every procedure requires in-person treatment, so figure out which patients require direct care versus virtual. According to The Harris Poll, 

 will take advantage of telehealth even after the pandemic ends and most people are comfortable with virtual appointments. Still, many patients appreciate the option of in-person care, so offer both choices.

2. Meet patients where they are in terms of technology.

A lot of virtual appointments require a strong internet signal and a functioning smartphone. While many people have access to these devices, low-income patients or those in rural areas 

 without these tools. These patients rely on simple phone calls and in-person appointments to get the care they need, so meet them where they are.

The success of patient care technology hinges on patient engagement. Before incorporating different technologies across the board, providers should experiment with smaller groups of patients to determine what works. Patient demands evolve with technology, and 

 are more important than ever. For example, patients certainly care about treatment results, but they also expect phenomenal customer service and high-tech interfaces.

As healthcare providers expand their telehealth networks, staff members need proper training to handle the demand. New York recently introduced a 

 that included continuing education of professionals working with telehealth technology. Providers can implement a similar program on a micro level to prepare staff for the future.

As more and more providers shift back to in-person patient care, it’s important to understand which patients can be treated as such. Once you understand the difference, you can move forward with better technologies and safety procedures to reassure in-person patients while catering to those who would rather stay home.

, a consulting firm driven to create innovative, growth-oriented, and people-first solutions. 

Healthcare providers can consider these strategies when developing a plan to transition to more frequent in-office treatment.

Preparing for the ‘Old Normal’: How to Handle More In-Person Patient Visits Again

Healthcare has become one of those “just don’t go there” topics in the United States, and this unspoken rule goes way beyond the family dinner table. The divide has become so polarizing that even healthcare providers find it difficult to discuss ways to control costs and improve care. Yet we must. What everyone agrees on-political parties and patients alike-is that healthcare is 

So why is healthcare reform so controversial? At its heart, the healthcare argument is a question about rights. On one hand, some believe 

 that the government is obligated to meet. In fact, more than half of Americans support this idea. On the other hand, some believe healthcare is 

It’s easy to get caught up in this political binary and forget the overarching goal: ensuring better, more cost-efficient care and solving problems within the U.S. healthcare system as a whole. Regardless of personal beliefs, the system always has to work for patients, including on a financial level. Otherwise, it’s simply not sustainable.

In the current political discussion about healthcare, both sides seem to be missing critical pieces of a broader picture. On the left, there’s no incentive to provide exceptional care. On the right, there’s less benefit for a significant number of patients.

Market Forces That Change How Payers See Healthcare

When having these critical conversations in healthcare, we should remove political variables from the equation and discuss outcomes-based healthcare-not whether healthcare is a fundamental right (and certainly not in terms of dollars).

Moving to an outcomes-based system would control costs for both providers and patients. In turn, it would move the industry forward and improve patient care and financial accountability. An outcomes-based healthcare system would also incentivize practitioners to hit the sweet spot of best possible care and lowered costs. Here, everyone wins.

Canada provides a strong example of how an outcomes-based model can bridge the divide between healthcare that’s universal and financially sustainable. There’s a perception of socialized medicine creating tremendous costs, bloated administrations, and inefficient care that leaves patients waiting months or more for appointments.

That’s true to an extent: Wealthier Canadians do visit the U.S. for care or rely on 

 for specialized services. However, Canada is also learning to improve, and the country is doing so by tracking and improving outcomes with 

To shift the conversation away from an “us versus them” gridlock, healthcare executives must explain how outcomes-based care helps all parties involved.

Parties could argue this in their own ways. On the Republican side, outcomes-based care costs less and results in stronger financials. On the Democratic side (or the universal healthcare side), it unclogs the system. Positive results exist down the line, including healthier people, better working conditions, more workers employed, and more efficient care.

To get there, the industry must become dedicated to tracking and analyzing relevant data. Additionally, healthcare executives should practice sharing data with healthcare providers in the field to help make better-informed patient plans.

 found that physicians already receive data, but not anything that leads to better outcomes. About two-thirds of physicians regularly receive feedback on their performance and productivity, but only 28% hear anything about costs. This neither incentivizes nor empowers physicians to find lower-cost treatments or testing options for patients.

The saying “you can’t manage what you can’t measure” exists for a reason: It’s true. We’re not providing physicians with any kind of data that will help control costs.

The way we’re talking about healthcare now isn’t working. We’re at a standstill, with one side in direct opposition to the other. By shifting the conversation from healthcare access versus healthcare financials, we can begin to move forward.

, a consulting firm driven to create innovative, growth-oriented, and people-first solutions. Read more about the work Pariveda Solutions does 

The way providers talk about healthcare-already one of the most contentious topics in U.S. public life-is sure to change over the next year.

Opinion: Outcomes, Not Politics, Should Drive the Healthcare Conversation

“Disruption” is a watchword of the business world, whether we’re talking about Uber upending transportation or Amazon redefining retail. It’s no less applicable in the healthcare space. Technological disruption brings positive and negative changes-as well as more complexity-to the industry. But when guided by a clear vision of social responsibility, disruptive technology offers impressive benefits.

Predictive analytics in healthcare powered by artificial intelligence represents one of the most disruptive shifts. After all, it’s fundamentally changing what it means to deliver value to both patients and society. Because this is especially pertinent considering the importance of social responsibility in healthcare, the industry is racing to find new ways to take advantage.

Accurate prediction is crucial to successful medical interventions. It’s not surprising that advances in this technology would be in such demand. Initial offerings have been very promising, and machine learning systems are already working to predict risk of 

This isn’t limited to specific illnesses, either. Currently, there are multiple organizations holding competitions to find AI-based solutions for other healthcare-related issues (such as unnecessary hospital readmissions). We’re also likely to see advanced analytics assist doctors in the development of personalized patient treatment plans. It’s clear that the benefits of predictive analytics in healthcare could be extended to nearly any aspect of medicine.

Part of the technological challenge involves using massive data sets that incorporate information from many patients. This has its own difficulties, including adhering to privacy laws, ensuring data sets are “

,” and finding the right modeling approach to glean the most insight.

How Three Hospitals Use Predictive Analytics to Reduce Readmissions

However, conquering these big data challenges in healthcare will pay off in many ways. It’s likely to play a major role in the search for cures for some of our most devastating illnesses.

Another major benefit of predictive analytics in healthcare includes revolutionizing the customer journey. Clear, accurate communication is incredibly important to patients and families, and AI could provide online chatbots, interactive information kiosks in hospitals, and other systems that provide information on demand.

In this regard, systems for predictive analytics in healthcare shouldn’t be seen as disruptors, but as enablers. They’ll enable patients and their families to access healthcare that’s much more efficient, safe, accurate, and private. Likewise, they’ll also make it easier for medical professionals and administrators to provide that experience. This will allow the industry to adhere to a new vision of social responsibility, deliver solutions to stakeholders in a modern way, and help doctors humanize patient interactions.

Social responsibility and benefits for all

The benefits of predictive analytics in healthcare (as well as implementing new solutions as a whole) will usher in a new era. But whether this causes complexity and increased overhead for overburdened healthcare centers or streamlines and enhances services will depend on how it’s implemented.

When considering the many potential disruptive technologies to implement, executives should always prioritize a sense of shared social responsibility. It’s crucial to gather insight from many different players, whether they’re C-suite executives, administrators, doctors, patients, vendors, or others. By working together, the industry will make great strides toward not only an enhanced patient experience, but also reduced costs, increased accuracy, and streamlined information management.

Besides this, leaders should keep patient experience and centricity top of mind. To start, emphasize researching treatments for endemic illnesses such as cancer and ensure the research keeps accessibility at the forefront. Without this focus, the gap between those who can and can’t afford cutting-edge medical care will only widen. Just because something is disruptive doesn’t mean it’s a panacea. Without proper planning, any new technology can create socially divisive pitfalls and implications.

Predictive analytics will bring disruption. This is certain. But with the right planning and consideration by executives-including a focus on social responsibility as a whole-the disruption itself can be incredibly positive.